首页 理论教育 境内企业污染传播存在失灵与重建

境内企业污染传播存在失灵与重建

时间:2023-11-21 理论教育 版权反馈
【摘要】:TRI数据库的存在使得从公民个人到立法机构都有了可以量化以确定风险的科学依据;同时,好的公共政策的出台需要科学知识与社会正义的结合,多层次的公众参与能够保障这一目标的实现。在TRI数据库基础上多层公众参与的借鉴意义。本研究这种基于TRI数据库基础上多层次的公众参与,对于推动解决我国企业污染的传播失灵具有一定的借鉴意义。

境内企业污染传播存在失灵与重建

通过TRI数据库在美国30多年实践的分析,我们发现对于企业的环境污染,需要有多利益主体、多层次的公众参与,以形成公众的选择,达成一致的舆论,再进一步推动政策的出台。TRI数据库的存在使得从公民个人到立法机构都有了可以量化以确定风险的科学依据;同时,好的公共政策的出台需要科学知识与社会正义的结合,多层次的公众参与能够保障这一目标的实现。这一过程实质还是信息对称下的公众选择。[77]在各类公众参与过程中,认知风险一直是公众参与的主要目标,各类公众参与形式是实现这一目标的程序保障。企业的公众参与,对内是为了监测企业风险,对外是为了树立负责任的社会形象以获取更多的市场利润,对公众来说有了风险感知的目标客体;初级公众参与中公民个体或社区团体,为了主动争取风险信息双向流通的参与机会,是获取参与的前提;部分公众参与是通过大众传媒与专业民间团体,把风险的科学知识用大众化的语言传递给公众,其目的是为了让公众与政策制定者之间缩小知识沟,形成强大的舆论,为建立双向信息流通创造条件;充分公众参与是在保障前三种公众参与的前提下,实现体制内的权力去中心化,达到风险管控政策的科学化与社会正义性。这四个层次具有阶梯性与递进性的特征,彼此有不可或缺、各有各的功能。

在TRI数据库基础上多层公众参与的借鉴意义。我国现在还没有建立TRI数据库,目前对于企业环境污染最有影响力的监督形式是中央环保督察。从2016年开始的中央环保督察在我国环境保护过程中起到了重要的作用。前三批中央环保督察之后,初步立案处罚的企业15 586家,罚款额度7.75亿元,立案侦查案件1 154起,行政和刑事拘留人数为1 075人。然而,上述这些信息只有结果,具体信息从未对社会公开过。[78]权力监督及其制约理论为政府干预地方环境保护工作、全面开展中央环保督察提供了理论依据。同时,后工业社会理论认为环境污染这类负外部公共属性管理问题,是两级体制(即政府和企业)失灵所造成的,需要引入第三部门的参与管理与监督。[79]中央环保督察这种属于政府内部的权力监督,有学者认为这种权力制约的方式不可避免地形成一种拮抗效果,将会导致管理资源的内部消耗,也将会增加社会治理的成本,不利于我国环境公共利益的实现,[80]这还是没有逃过政府失灵的圈子。不过,中央环保督察在我国还是必要的,督查代表党中央国务院在管理上有权威性,是由监督企业—监督政府—监督地方党委建构的权力监督模式,[81]督查推动了地方政府治理环境的效率,这是基于我国国情对于环境保护重点工作的顶层设计不断细化的结果。同时,我国的环境保护应该有充分的多层面的公众参与,形成畅通的有效传播,包括政府、企业和各层次公众的多元主体。本研究这种基于TRI数据库基础上多层次的公众参与,对于推动解决我国企业污染的传播失灵具有一定的借鉴意义。

【注释】

[1]Coase,R.,‘The Problem of Social Cost’,Journal of Law and Economics,October,1960,Vol.3,pp.1-44.

[2]Williamson,O.,The Economic Institutions of Capitalism,NY:The Free Press,1985.

[3]本节研究中所涉及的TRI有害化学品清单,是根据美国环境保护署的TRI数据库官方网站上所公布的历年清单等文件来进行研究的。此部分涉及的美国环保署官方文件,均来自本页面:http://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/tri-listed-chemicals.

[4]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Basics of TRI Reporting.http://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/basics-tri-reporting,2016-01-20.

[5]Hamilton,J.Regulation through Revelation:the origin,politics,and impacts of the Toxics Release Inventory Program.New York:Cambridge University Press.2005:191.

[6]City of Eugene.Citizen Guide to the City of Eugene Toxics Right-to-Know Program.http://www.eugene-or.gov/ArchiveCenter/View File/Item/2054,20-13-08-21.

[7]侯佳儒、林燕梅:《美国有毒物质排放清单制度的经验与启示》,《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》,2014年第1期,第86—91页。

[8]US Fed News Service,Including USState News.Edge Tech Industries of Davenport,Iowa,to Pay$26,000 Penalty for Failure to Report Annual Toxic Release Inventory for Lead.http://search.proquest.com/docview/750154588?accountid=13818,2010-09-10.

[9]United States Environmental Protection Agency.How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used?.http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/2003_TRI_Data_Uses_report.pdf,2003-05.

[10]Red Dog Operations.Understanding the Toxics Release Inventory Report.http://www.reddogalaska.com/Generic.aspx?PAGE=Red+Dog+Site%2fEnvironmental+Pages%2f TRI&portal Name=tc,2009.

[11]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Addition of Certain Chemicals Final Rule.http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/1994chemicalexpansionfinal.pdf,1994-11-30.

[12]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Methyl Ethyl Ketone.http://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/methyl-ethyl-ketone,2005-06-30.

[13]Pollution Watch.Great Lakes Still Under Siege from Toxic Pollution.http://www.pollutionwatch.org/pressroom/releases/20100421.jsp,2010-04-21.

[14]United States Environmental Protection Agency.How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used?.http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/2003_TRI_Data_Uses_report.pdf,2003-05.

[15]Goodenow,E.Lake Erie ranks in nation's top 50 for carcinogens dumped into water.http://chronicle.northcoastnow.com/2012/04/24/lake-erie-ranks-in-nation%E2%80%99stop-50-for-carcinogens-dumped-into-water,2012-04-24.

[16]美国主流报纸中,《纽约时报》对于环境问题发表的报道最多,故此部分选取其报道数量作为特定污染物的公众认知度的表征。此部分所涉及的特定时期内关于甲基异氰酸酯的媒体报道,均在《纽约时报》的档案搜索页面(http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/nytarchive.html)中,通过搜索特定时间段内含有关键词“methyl isocyanate”(即甲基异氰酸酯)的报道所得到的。此部分所涉及的关于其他有害化学品的媒体报道,均是通过相同方法所得到。

[17]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Why was the TRI Program created?https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/learn-about-toxics-release-inventory#Why was the TRI Program created?,2016 05-22.

[18]董立延:《水俣病:现代社会的一面镜子——从公害发源地到环境模范都市》,《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》,2013年第7期,第179—183页。

[19]Clary,J.,The Toxicology of Methanol,Hoboken:John Wiley&Sons,Inc.,2013,pp.112-113.

[20]Hayes T B,Collins A,Lee M,et al.Hermaphroditic,demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2002,99(8):5476-5480.

[21]National Toxicology Program.1-Bromopropane.http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles/bromopropane.pdf,2016-04-13.

[22]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Addition of 1-Bromopropane Final Rule.https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-11-23/pdf/2015-29799.pdf,2016-04-18.

[23]唐兴华、李琼、曾婉婷、刘世喜:《硫酸钡制剂在消化道造影中的不良反应及并发症研究进展》,《中国全科医学》,2013年第27期,第2536—2538页。

[24]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Deletion of Barium Sulfate Final Rule.https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1994-06-28/html/94-15578.htm,2016-04-20.

[25]李艳萍、张立仁、熊永根:《急性氯化氢吸入中毒144例临床报告》,《工业卫生与职业病》,2007年第1期,第51—52页。

[26]United States Environmental Protection Agency.Hydrochloric Acid.https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/hydrochloric-acid,2016-04-24.

[27]张秦初、唐承汉、尚明琪:《一例氢氧化钠中毒尸检报告》,《中国法医学杂志》,1987年第3期,第170—171、197页。

[28]广东省环境信息中心:《中海壳牌石油化工有限公司年度自行监测报告》.http://www.epinfo.org/selfmonitor/getSelf MonitorReport List/report/ad8bd3e8-4074-11e3-a6a2-6c626d51ef74?ename=中海壳牌石油化工有限公司,2016.

[29]王积龙:《新环保法规框架下我国境内跨国公司的环境信息公开机制研究》,《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,2015年第10期,第122—127页。

[30]Slovic,P.,‘Informing and Educating the Public about the Risk’,Risk Analysis,1986,p.408.

[31]Fischhoff,B.,Watson,S.R.,&Hope,C.,‘Defining Risk’,Policy Sciences,1984(17),pp.123-139.

[32]Cvtkovich,G.,Social Trust and the Management of Risk,London:Earthscan Publication,2000.

[33]Lauber,T.B.,&Knuth,B.A.,‘Fairness in Moose Management Decision-making:The Citizens'Perspective’,Wild Society Bulletin,1997,25(4),pp.19-37.

[34]Understanding Risk:Informing Decision in a Democratic Society,National Research Council,Washington D.C.:National Academy Press,1996.

[35]Mirel,B.,‘Debating Nuclear Energy:Theories of Risk and Purposes of Communication’,Technical Communication Quarterly,1994(3),pp.41-65.

[36]Waddell,C.,‘Defining Sustainable Development:A Case Study in Environmental Communication’,Technical Communication Quarterly,1994(4),pp.201-216.

[37]Winner,L.,‘Citizen Virtues in a Technological Order’,In Andrew Feenberg&Alastair Hannay,(Eds.),Technology and the Politics of Knowledge,Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1995,pp.65-84.

[38]Rowan,K.,‘What Risk Communicators Need to Know:An Agenda for Research’,In Brant Burleson(Ed.),Communication Yearbook 18,International Communication Association,1994b,pp.300-319.

[39]Stratman,J.E.,Boykin,C.,Holmes,M.C.,‘Risk Communication Meta-communication,and Rhetorical States in the Aspen EPA Superfund Controversy’,Journal of Business and Technical Communication,1995(9),pp.5-41.

[40]Renn,O.,Webler,T.,&Wiedmann,P.M.,Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation:Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1995,p.5.(www.xing528.com)

[41]Lynn,F.M.,Kartez,J.D.,‘Environmental Democracy in Action:The Toxics Release Inventory’,Environmental Management,Vol.18,No.4,1994,pp.511-521.

[42]Iacofano,D.,Moore,R.,&Goltsman,S.,‘Public Involvement in Transit Planning:A Case Study of Piece Transit,Tacoma,Washington,USA’,In H.Sanoff(Ed.),Participatory Design:Theory&Techniques,Henry Sanoff,1990,pp.196-205.

[43]Belsten,L.,‘Environmental Risk Communication and Community Collaboration’,In Star Muir&Thomas Veenendall(Eds.),Earthtalk,Westport,Connecticut:Praeger Series in Political Communication,1996,p.31.

[44]‘Safety Health and The Environment’,Boeing Company Website,January 7th,2003.

[45]Pine,J.,1997 Toxics Release Inventory and Right-to-Know Conference Proceedings,Washington D.C.:EPA,September 8,1997.

[46]McDonnell,Jeff S.,‘The Toxics Release Inventory:A New Challenge for Electric Utilities’,How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used?,Washington D.C.:EPA,2003,p.32.

[47]Rice,F.,‘Who Scores Best on the Environment’,Fortune,Vol.128,No.2,July 26th,1993.

[48]Ford Sustainability Report 2017-2018,Ford Motor Company,2018.

[49]《绿色供应链:CITI指数2015年度评价报告》,公众环境研究中心,2016年,第2页。

[50]Grabill,J.T.&Simmons,W.M.,“Toward a Critical Rhetoric of Risk Communication:Producing Citizens and the Role of Technical Communicators”,Technical Communication Quarterly,1998,7(4),pp.415 441.

[51]Rowe,G.,&Frewer,L.J.,‘A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms’,Science Technology&Human Values,2005,30(20),pp.251-290.

[52]Wilson,D.,An Unreasonable Woman A True Story of Shrimpers,Politicos,Polluters,and the Flight for Seadrift,Texas,Chelsea Green Publishing Company,September 15,2006.

[53]A Citizen's Guide to Reducing Toxic Risks,Puting the Toxics Release Inventory to Work!,Washington D.C.:EPA,1998.

[54]State Directory:33/50 and Voluntary Pollution Prevention Program,Washington D.C.:U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,1993,October 1993.

[55]Breathing Poison:The Toxic Costs of Industries in Calcasieu Parish,Residents of Calcasieu Parish,Louisiana,Mossville Environmental Action Network,June 2000.

[56]A Citizen's Guide to Reducing Toxic Risks,Using the Toxics Release Inventory,EPA's Pacific Southwest Regional Office,Summer,2002.

[57]JSI Center for Environmental Health Studies:A Division of the JSIR Rearch and Training Institute,data available at the website www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/Intl Health/index.cfm on Oct 30,2018.

[58]‘TRI Curriculum Project for Universities and High Schools’,data available at the website www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-10/documents/bk2_wed_8_katers_eggert_0.pdf on Oct 30,2018.

[59]Kolacovic,G.,‘Poor Neighborhoods and Poor Health’,Los Angels Times.October 18,2001.

[60]Plough,A.,&Krimsky,S.,Environmental Hazards:Communicating Risks as a Social Process,Dover:Auburn House,1988,p.305.

[61]Eilperin,J.,‘Toxic Releases Rose 16 persent in 2010,EPA Says’,The Washington Post,January 5th,2012.

[62]Benjamin Penn,‘The Smokestack Effect:Toxic Air and America's Schools’,USA TODAY,April 1th,2009.

[63]Beale,S.,‘The Most Toxic Towns in Rhode Island’,www.golocalprov.com,April 12,2012.

[64]Brennan,M.,“America's 10 Most Toxic Cities”,www.forbus.com,February 28,2011.

[65]Oltman,S.,Kate S.,‘America's Top 10 Polluting Power Stations’,The Guardian,January 12,2012.

[66]How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used?,Washington D.C.:EPA,2003,p.36.

[67]‘8.5 Million Pounds of Toxic Materials in New Jersey's Waterway’,Dredging Today,April 5th,2012.

[68]Augenstein,S.,‘Delaware River is 5th Most Polluted River in U.S.,Environmental Group says’,New Jersey Real-Time News,April 5th,2012.

[69]Ross,S.M.,‘Two Rivers,Two Vessels:Environmental Problem Solving in an Intercultural Context’,In Star Muir&Thomas Veenendall(Eds.),Earthtalk,Westport,Connecticut:Praeger Series in Political Communication,1996,pp.171-190.

[70]Fung and O'Bourke,‘Reinventing Environmental Regulations from the Grassroots Up’,Environmental Management,Vol 25,Issue 2,February 2000,pp 115-127.

[71]Economic Analysis of the Final Rule to Add Certain Industry Groups to EPCRA Section 313,Washington D.C.:EPA,April 1997,pp.6 29.

[72]‘States as Innovators:It's Time for a New Look to Our Laboratories of Democracy in the Effort to improve Our Approach to Environmental Regulation’,Alabama Law Review 347,pp.370-371.

[73]Economic Analysis of the Final Rule to Add Certain Industry Groups to EPCRA Section 313,Washington D.C.:EPA,April 1997,pp.6-29.

[74]John McQuaid,‘Q&A:What is Environmental Justice?’,NOLA Live,January 7th,2002.

[75]Bullard,R.,‘Confronting Environmental Racism in the Twenty-First Century’.Global Dialogue,April 26,2012.

[76]Foucault,M.,‘The Subject and Power’,In Huber L.Dreyfus&Paul Rabinow(Eds.),Michel Foucault:Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics,Chicago:University of Chicago,1982,pp.208-226.

[77]Simmons,M.,Participation and Power Civic Discourse in Environmental Policy Decision,Oneonta:State University of New York Press,2005,p.26.

[78]《积弊 清理:2016—2017年度120城市污染源监管信息公开指数(PITI)报告》,公众环境研究中心,2017年,第11—13页。

[79]若弘:《中国NGO:非政府组织在中国》,人民出版社,2015年,第5—12页。

[80]刘奇、张金池:《基于比较分析的中央环保督察制度研究》,《环境保护》,2018年第11期,第51—54页。

[81]常纪文、王鑫:《由督企、督政到督地方党委:环境监督模式转变的历史逻辑》,《环境保护》,2016年第7期,第18—23页。

免责声明:以上内容源自网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。

我要反馈