评价方法是对评价对象及其相关属性数据的处理方式。人文社会科学网络学术信息质量的评价方法总体上可分为定量评价方法、定性评价方法以及定性和定量相结合的综合评价方法三类。定量评价是根据人文社会科学网络学术信息资源的外在形式特征对其进行计量和评判,如人文社会科学网络学术信息的差别测量等,其优点是便于各种评价对象之间的客观比较,缺点是仅仅依靠评价对象的外在特征、对内容属性关注不足,不够精细和具体,较适合大批量信息的整体评价。定性评价是用户对人文社会科学网络学术信息的感知和满足评价,包含了科学和价值判断的一种精细化评价。定性和定量相结合的综合评价方法是指将用户的主观感知和定量评价指标相结合,二者相互补充、相互修正,以克服用户主观经验认知的偏差。
【注释】
[1]韩青青.马克思主义精神生产理论及当代启示[D].沈阳:东北大学,2014:13.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:88.
[3]李寿德,万威武.精神生产的特征及其产品的存在形态和价值评价标准[J].中国软科学,2000(2):107-111.
[4]Kaplan A.The Conduct of Inquiry:Methodology for Behavioral Science[M].San Francisco:Chandler Publishing Company,1964:177-178.
[5]马庆国.管理科学研究方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:49-50.
[6]Boyce B R,Meadow C T,Kraft D H.Measurement in Information Science[M].San Diego:Academic Press Inc.,1994:16.
[7]Ding J D,Qiu J P.An Approach to Improve the Indicator Weights of Scientific and Technological Competitiveness Evaluation of Chinese Universities[J].Scientometrics,2011,86(2):285-297.
[8]葛某智,Markus H.信息质量研究的现状与未来研究方向[J].科技资源导刊,2009,41(1):5-16.
[9]段宇锋.网络信息资源老化规律研究[J].图书情报知识,2005(8):28-31.
[10]段宇锋.网络信息资源配置与调控机制——基于网络信息计量学的研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2011:53.
[11]孙建军.链接分析知识基础、研究主体、研究热点与前沿综述——基于科学知识图谱的途径[J].情报学报,2014,33(6):659-672.
[12]翟云仙,毛一国.电子期刊参考引文的链接与CrossRef[J].图书情报工作,2002(10):79-83.
[13]张晓林.开放数字环境下的参考文献链接[J].现代图书情报技术,2002(1):9-13.
[14]丁敬达,杨思洛.国内图书情报学期刊网络引文的类型、分布与可追溯性分析[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(24):60-64.
[15]关于Tags,背景解说和应用设想[EB/OL].[2016-12-1].http://www.dwei.net/blog/article.aspid=2.
[16]杨琳桦.博客要来一场Tag革命[N].[2016-10-19].21世纪经济报道.
[17]黄晨.Lib2.0的观念与变革——以维基(Wiki)和标签(Tag)为例[J].图书馆杂志,2007,26(8):36-39.
[18]顾立平.基于Web2.0用户信息检索行为的交互设计:后设分析与问卷调查研究[J].图书情报知识,2009(5):26-34.
[19]常唯.标签在数字学木资派内容揭示中的作用研究[J].图书馆杂志,2007(1):46-52.
[20]Henzinger M R.Hyperlink Analysis for the Web[J].IEEE Internet Computing,2001,5(1):5-50.
[21]Vaughan L,Hysen K.Relationship between Links to Journal Web Sites and Impact Factors[J].Aslib Proceedings,2002,54(6):356-361.
[22]Mckiernan G.CitedSites:Citation Indexing of Web Resources[EB/OL].[2013-12-04].http://www2.iastate.edu/~cyberstacks/Cited.htm.
[23]Rousseau R.Sitations:An Exploratory Study[EB/OL].[2013-12-05].http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v1i1p1.html.
[24]Ingwersen P.The Calculation of Web Impact Factors[J].Journal of Documentation,1998,54(2):236-243.(www.xing528.com)
[25]Thelwall M,Wilkinson D.Three Target Document Range Metrics for University Web Sites[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2003,54(6):490-497.
[26]Brin S,Page L.The Anatomy of a Large-scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine[EB/OL].[2016-10-12].http://www7.scue.du.au/programme/fullpapers/1921/com1921.htm.
[27]Bar-Ilan J,Levene M.The Hw-Rank:an H-Index Variant for Ranking Web Pages[J].Scientometrics,2015,102(3):2247-2253.
[28]Priem J,Groth P,Taraborelli D.The Altmetrics Collection[J].PLOS ONE,2012,7(11):e48753.
[29]Bollen J,Sompel H V.Usage Impact Factor:The Effects of Sample Characteristics on Usagebased Impact Metrics[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(1):136-149.
[30]宋玲玲.基于PLoS ALMs的论文影响力评价指标研究——以航空航天医学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(9):30-36.
[31]赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁.基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].2016,42(221):96-108.
[32]Li Xuemei,Thelwall M,Giustini D.Validating Online Reference Managers for Scholarly Impact Measurement[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):461-471.
[33]苏新宁.文献计量学与科学评价中有关问题思考[J].图书与情报,2013(1):79-83.
[34]邱均平,张心源,董克.Altmetrics指标在机构知识库中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(2):100-105.
[35]Kargar M J,Azimzadeh F,Ramli A R.An Experimental Framework for Ranking Quality of Information Weblog[EB/OL].[2014-11-01].http://mitiq.mit.edu/ICIQ/Documents/IQ%20Conference%202008/Papers/1A-2%20Kargar%20et%20al.pdf.
[36]刘锦宏,罗紫初.网络科技论文专家评价模型研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2007(3):48-51.
[37]顾立平.论文级别计量研究:应用案例分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2013(11):1-7.
[38]邱均平,张心源,董克.Altmetrics指标在机构知识库中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(2):100-105.
[39]Kousha K,Thelwal M.Google Scholar Citations and GoogleWeb/URL Citations:Amulti-discipline Exploratory Analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(7):1055-1065.
[40]Thelwall M,Kousha K.Online Presentations as a Source of Scientific Impact? An Analysis of PowerPoint Files Citing Academic Journals[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(5):805-815.
[41]Kousha K,Thelwall M.Assessing the Impact of Disciplinary Research Onteaching:An Automatic Analysis of Online Syllabuses[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(13):2060-2069.
[42]Kousha K,Thelwall M.Google Book Search:Citation Analysis for Social Science and the Humanities[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(8):1537-1549.
[43]Shema H,Bar-Ilan J,Thelwall M.Do Blog Citations Correlate with a Higher Number of Future Citations? Research Blogs as a Potential Source for Alternative Metrics[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(5):1018-1027.
[44]邱均平.网络计量学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:263-264.
[45]邱均平,朱少强.宏观与微观学术评价之关系探讨[J].图书馆论坛,2006(12):51-53.
[46]叶继元.基于质量与创新测度的人文社会科学“全评价”体系及其应用[EB/OL].[2014-09-12].http://www.haosou.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.npopss-cn.gov.cn%2FGB%2F219470%2F16385687.html&q=叶继元+全评价&ts=1444724029&t=d97ca421511fd7cdb34d42a46ee117a&src=haosou.
[47]http://www.ipl.org/[EB/OL].
[48]http://www.dmoz.org/[EB/OL].
[49]http://www.alexa.com[EB/OL].
免责声明:以上内容源自网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。