首页 理论教育 督学在合作性美国公立中小学董事会中的管理特点

督学在合作性美国公立中小学董事会中的管理特点

时间:2023-07-16 理论教育 版权反馈
【摘要】:(三)合作性美国公立中小学董事会的主要职能是制定政策,在此基础上,董事会委托督学实施政策,督学的角色主要是负责学校的日常管理工作,董事会基于工作绩效评估督学的工作表现,双方在学校的管理中形成了有效的工作关系,彼此相互交流和沟通。

督学在合作性美国公立中小学董事会中的管理特点

(一)专业性

通过对美国城市公立中小学督学的管理活动与管理关系的研究看出,美国城市公立中小学把学校的管理权交付专家式的督学,督学在K-12教育、政府部门、高等教育管理部门、私营部门、非营利性部门的丰富工作经历(见图3-6),为督学的管理工作奠定了一定的理论和实践基础,这大大提高了督学在学校的管理效率,使得学校管理成为一个专业化的管理区域。

图3-6 2014年督学接受任命前的工作经历分布

(资料来源:The Council of the Great City Schools.Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:2-6.)

(二)学术性

无论是美国公立中小学董事会在制定政策时,还是督学在管理学校日常运作时,学生的学术成绩都是他们共同关注的目标。他们首要关注的仍是学生的学术表现,提高学生的学术成绩,引导学生意识到学术成绩与工作的关系,增强学生的专业知识和素养。

(三)合作性

美国公立中小学董事会的主要职能是制定政策,在此基础上,董事会委托督学实施政策,督学的角色主要是负责学校的日常管理工作,董事会基于工作绩效评估督学的工作表现,双方在学校的管理中形成了有效的工作关系,彼此相互交流和沟通。学区行政部门、政客、社区组织、学校员工、地方大学、社区成员、公立学校、家长等利益相关者,与督学也建立合作的工作关系。

【注释】

[1]The Council of the Great City Schools.Annual Report 2014-2015.http://www.cgcs.org/cms/lib/DC00001581/Centricity/Domain/16/Annual%20Report% 20 final-website.pdf,2016-07-14.

[2]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:1.

[3]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:2.

[4]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Board Survey:Characteristics,Structure,and Benefits,Second Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2009:13.

[5]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:2.

[6]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:2.

[7]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:3.

[8]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:3.(www.xing528.com)

[9]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:3.

[10]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:3.

[11]The Council of the Great City Schools.“Urban School Superintendents:Characteristics,Tenure,and Salary,Eighth Survey and Report”.Urban Indicator,Fall 2014:1.

[12]J.H.Davis,F.D.Schoorman,L.Donaldson.“Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”.The Academy of Management Review,1997 (1):24.

[13]Rickey Joe Williams.Practices of Board Presidents and Superintendents in Academically High-achieving Texas Urban School Districts.The University of Texas at Austin,2008:54-55.

[14]Tamar Gutner.“Explaining the Gaps Between Mandate and Performance:Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform”.Global Environmental Politics,2005 (2):10-37.

[15]J.H.Davis,F.D.Schoorman,L.Donaldson.“Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”.The Academy of Management Review,1997 (1):20-47.

[16]Peter Wright,Ananda Mukherji,Mark J.Kroll.“A Reexamination of Agency Theory Assumptions:Extensions and Extrapolations”.Journal of Socio-Economics,2001 (5):413.

[17]L.E.Preston.“Agents,Stewards,and Stakeholders”.The Academy of Management Review,1998 (1):9.

[18]Robert Albanese,M.T.Dacin,I.C.Harris.“Agents as Stewards”.The Academy of Management Review,1997 (3):610.

[19]B.G.Glaser,A.L.Strauss.The Discovery of Grounded Theory:Strategies for Qualitative Research.New York:Aldine Publishing Company,1967:3.

[20]D.M.Mertens.Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology:Integrating Diversity with Quantitative,Qualitative,and Mixed Methods (2nd ed.) .London:Sage Publications,2005:423.

[21]Rickey Joe Williams.Practices of Board Presidents and Superintendents in Academically High-achieving Texas Urban School Districts.The University of Texas at Austin,2008:182-183.

[22]Elizabeth Hall Hamilton.The Role of the Superintendent in Ensuring School Board Focus on Student Achievement.University of Southern California,2012:1.

[23]Elizabeth Hall Hamilton.The Role of the Superintendent in Ensuring School Board Focus on Student Achievement.University of Southern California,2012:2.

[24]Elizabeth Hall Hamilton.The Role of the Superintendent in Ensuring School Board Focus on Student Achievement.University of Southern California,2012:1-2.

[25]Elizabeth Hall Hamilton.The Role of the Superintendent in Ensuring School Board Focus on Student Achievement.University of Southern California,2012:6.

[26]Rickey Joe Williams.Practices of Board Presidents and Superintendents in Academically High-achieving Texas Urban School Districts.The University of Texas at Austin,2008:163.

免责声明:以上内容源自网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。

我要反馈