首页 理论教育 锂离子电池正极材料:探索新突破

锂离子电池正极材料:探索新突破

时间:2023-06-30 理论教育 版权反馈
【摘要】:1.According to M.Saiful Islam et al.[9],the energy of dopant substitution or“solution”reaction can be calculated by combining appropriate defect and lattice energy.The calculated result shows that the lowest energy for

锂离子电池正极材料:探索新突破

Supervalent Doping of LiFePO4 with Special Rare Earth Ions:A Review[1]

Minshou Zhaoa,c,Xian Zhaob,Yuqing Qiaoa

(a College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)

(b College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

(c State Key Laboratory of Metastable Material Science and Technology,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao,Hebei 066004,China)

Abstract:The review addresses the work on supervalent doping of LiFePO4 with Nd,Gd,Sm,Eu and Yb ions carried out in our group.The dopant choice,the preparation of LiFe x Ml-x PO4,and the effect of supervalent doping with special rare earth ions on electrochemical performance are emphasized.

Key words:Cathode Material;Doping;Rare earth element;Lithium iron phosphate

Introduction

The scope of application of lithium ion battery with LiFePO4 as cathode material is currently expanding from mobile electronic devices to electric vehicles(EVs),power tools and hybrid-electric vehicles(HEVs),and it also has attractive prospects in space and military fields.This kind of lithium-ion battery is considered as a high-capacity and highpower battery because LiFePO4 has a higher theoretical capacity of 170 m Ah·g-1 and a flat discharge voltage of 3.4 V vs lithium,and has high safety characteristics and a long life cycle.LiFePO4 also has high thermal and chemical stability and offers economic and environmental advantages,being a low cost and non-toxic material[1,2,3].However,inherent poor electrical conductivity and slow lithium ion diffusivity are its obvious shortcomings[4],which result in poor dischargeability rate,and these factors restrict its practical use.Therefore,many approaches are used to improve its electrochemical performance to meet the demands in various fields.Currently,the main methods to overcome the disadvantages mentioned above are the following:improving the synthesis process to reduce the product particle size[5]and carbondoping[6,7]or bulk-doping of metal ions[8],which can enhance the comprehensive performance of the resultant product.Recently doping approaches have become a hot research area.

This review addresses the research results of the recent work on LiFePO4 carried out in our group.

1 Why some special rare earth ions?

1.According to M.Saiful Islam et al.[9],the energy of dopant substitution or“solution”reaction can be calculated by combining appropriate defect and lattice energy.The calculated result shows that the lowest energy for Nd3+ion is found at Fe site for all aliovalent cations.

2.Among all the rare earth elements,only Gd has 7 electrons in the outermost shell which is referred to as“half full 4f electron shell”.The special electronic structure itself provokes interest.

3.Among all the rare earth elements,three elements,Sm,Eu,and Yb,are well known abnormal elements.They often present stable 3 valence in their compounds,but also stable 2 valence in some reductive environments.

4.Aliovalent doping or substitution for Fe site in LiFePO4 will create many defects,which enhance electrochemical activity of LiFePO4,and then improve the electrochemical performance.

5.Aliovalent doping or substitution for Fe site seems to result in non-balance of charge in LiFePO4.However,aliovalent dopant charge is balanced by lithium vacancies,with the total charge on the iron site being+2.000(±0.006)[10].

Therefore,it is expected that doping LiFePO4 with these special rare earth ions mentioned above may improve the comprehensive performance of LiFePO4 and its special electrochemical properties.

2 Preparation of LiFel-x Mx PO4/C composite

LiFe1-x Mx PO4(M=Nd,Gd,Sm,Eu and Yb;x=0,0.01,0.02,0.04,0.06,0.08)compounds were synthesized by two-step heating solid-state reaction.CH3 COOLi·2H2 O(AR),FeC2O4·2 H2 O(AR),NH4 H2 PO4(AR)and M2O3(purity of 99.9 mass%)were mixed according to the stoichiometric amount of LiFePO4,using 5 mass%glucose as the reductive agent and carbon source.Milling(ball-to-powder weight ratio of 15∶1)was carried out for 8 hr,using anhydrous ethanol as dispersing agent under the argon atmosphere.The powder material was ground and compressed into a pellet after the anhydrous ethanol was evaporated.It was preheated at 400℃for 6 hr and then calcined at 700℃for 16 hr in the series resistance furnace.All these heat treatments were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere.

3 Sample characterization

Thermogravimetric analysis of all kinds of precursors was conducted in a Pyris Diamond TG/DSC apparatus in the temperature range from 40℃to 810℃.The structure of all kinds of powder samples was analyzed by X-ray diffraction(XRD)in RIGAKU D/max-2500/pc.The sample morphology was observed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope(FE-SEM)in S-4800 FE-SEM equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopy(EDS),which was used to analyze the elemental composition.The distribution of the material particle size was measured by ZetaPAL laser particle size analyzer.The electrochemical performance has been measured using galvanostatic charge/discharge and ElS methods.The magnetic measurement of LiFePO4/C sample was performed by SQUID on a Magnetic Property Measurement System(SQUID)XL-7.

4 Cathode preparation,cell assembly and charge/discharge test

The electrode was prepared by dispersing 80 mass%active material,15 mass%acetylene black and 5 mass%polyvinylidene fluoride(PVd F)in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone(NMP)to form a slurry.The slurry was then coated onto an Al foil substrate(the electro-active material of about 1.5 mg·cm-2),dried under the infrared light,cut into pieces and weighted,and finally dried at 120℃for 16 hr in a vacuum drying oven.The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box,and the cathode film and the lithium metal foil anode were separated by a microporous polypropylene(Celgard 2400)separator containing a liquid electrolyte of 1M LiPF6 in 1∶1(vol.)EC/DMC.The cells were charged and discharged on electrochemical testing BTS-5V 10 m A,and the voltage range was between 4.2 V and 2.5 V.

5 Aliovalent doping with Neodymium or substitution for Fe sites

Hu et al.[11]reported that the discharge capacity and electric conductivity of LiFePO4 have been improved significantly after doping with neodymium ion,which was synthesized by hydrothermal method and mixed with glucose as carbon source.Doping some ions in LiFePO4 bulk to enhance the electric conductivity gave rise to much controversy.As recognized,coating carbon on the particle surface of LiFePO4 can increase the electric conductivity.Zhao et al.recently reported in detail the effect of neodymium aliovalent substitution on the structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4[12].

5.1 TG-DSC analysis

Fig.1 shows three obvious weight loss regions.The first one between 150℃and 230℃is related to the dehydration of the hydrates.The second one between 230℃and 300℃is related to the anaerobic thermal decomposition of glucose and the decomposition of FeC2O4 and NH4 H2 PO4.The third one between 470℃and 560℃should concern complete decomposition of residual glucose,FeC2O4 and NH4 H2 PO4.The corresponding DSC curve shows a smaller endothermic peak at 192.89℃and two exothermic peaks.The obvious one locates at 268.10℃which is related to the formation of LiFePO4 compound,and the other smaller one is between 470℃and 560℃where a new solidstate reaction with the transformation of crystalline structure occurs,as indicated in literature[13].Therefore,the choice of temperature higher than 600℃to synthesize the target product is reasonable and feasible.

Fig.1 TG-DSC analysis curve of LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C precursor

Oxidation of Fe2+ion into Fe3+ion should be avoided and the content of Fe3+ion in LiFePO4 should be decreased as much as possible during the experiment process,because the existence of Fe3+ion would seriously affect the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C.Therefore,it is imperative to explore the appropriate synthesis process.In our group,SQUID is used to measure the magnetic property of Fe3+in the sample.Fig.2 shows the measured magnetization curve of LiFePO4/C by us.The curve is a straight line if the impurity phases,which are ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic do not exist,whereas,non-linear behaviour will be observed at low-magnetic field if the impurity phases that are ferromagnetic or ferromagnetic exist[14,15].That is to say that the non-linear extent reflects the content of the impurity phases.Therefore,it is concluded from Fig.2 that the sample B,which was calcined at 700℃for 16 hr,contains less content of the impurity phases than the sample A,which was calcined at 700℃for 16 hr.Here,the synthesis process used for sample B is preferable.

Fig.2 Magnetization curve of LiFePO4/C

5.2 XRD pattern

The diffraction peak position and relative intensity of the LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C sample is almost the same as LiFePO4,as shown in Fig.3 and no impurity peak is observed,which suggests that the small amount of Nd3+-doped does not change the olivine crystal structure of LiFePO4.In addition,carbon diffraction peak is not observed in Fig.4,which implies that the addition of microcarbon also does not affect the crystal structure of LiFePO4.

Fig.3 XRD images of LiFePO4 and LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C

5.3 FE-SEM and EDS analysis

Fig.4 is FE-SEM image of LiFePO4,LiFePO4/C and LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C.It can be seen from(a)and(b)that the particle size is refined after adding a small amount of glucose which can be completely decomposed in the calcination process.During calcination process carbon is generated and can inhibit the generation of Fe3+and can be coated on LiFePO4 to prevent it from conglomeration.It is apparent from Fig.4(b)and(c)that the particle size of LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C(about 150 nm)is significantly smaller than that of LiFePO4/C(about 400 nm),which indicates that doping small amount of Nd3+ion can effectively reduce the particle size of LiFePO4.

Fig.4 FE-SEM image of LiFePO4,LiFePO4/C and LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C

The EDS analysis image of LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C is shown in Fig.5.The compositions of substation element are listed in Table 1.

Fig.5 EDS image of LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C

Table 1 Composition of substation element in LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C

Combined with XRD,these results indicate that Nd3+occupies Fe site in LiFePO4 or has been dissolved into the LiFePO4.

5.4 Electrochemical performance

As shown in Fig.6,7 and 8,LiFe0.96 Nd0.06 PO4 delivers the maximum discharge capacity of 165.2 m Ah·g-1,146.8 m Ah·g-1,125.7 m Ah·g-1,114.8 m Ah·g-1 at 0.2 C,1 C,2 C,5 C rates,respectively,and the capacity retention rate is 92.8%after 100 cycles.Fig.9 indicates that using PZS as carbon source for coating on the surface of LiFePO4 is more beneficial for the cycle stability than glucose.

Fig.6 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFel-x Ndx PO4/C(x=0~0.08)at 0.2 C rate

6 Aliovalent doping gadolinium or substitution for Fe site(www.xing528.com)

6.1 XRD

Fig.7 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFe0.04 Nd0.06 PO4/C at different rates

Fig.10A and Fig.10B show the XRD pattern of LiFePO4/C composite and Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattem for LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C composite[16],respectively.The observed pattern and calculated pattern match well in Fig.10B.The crystal phases of two samples are olivine structures indexed by orthorhombic Pnma.These results suggest that a small amount of Gd3+ion-doped does not affect the olivine structure of LiFePO4.In addition,a carbon diffraction peak is not observed in Fig.10A and Fig.10B,which implies that the micro-carbon coating does not affect the structure of LiFePO4 also.

Fig.8 Initial charge-discharge curve of LiFe0.94 Nd0.06 PO4/C of at different rates

Fig.9 Influence of different carbon source on cycle stability LiFePO4/C at a rate of 0.2C

However,XRD pattern of Gd-doped LiFePO4 shows more Bragg reflections than Gd-free LiFePO4 because the ionic radius of Gd3+ion doped(0.093 8 nm)is larger than that of Fe2+ion(0.078 nm),leading to bigger unit cell parameters,as shown in Table 2.Table 2 lists the unit cell parameter obtained from Rietveld refinement of the XRD for LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C and unit cell parameter of LiFe-PO4/C.Results of Rietveld refinement confirm that Gd3+ion has been successfully doped into the LiFePO4/C.Clearly,doping a small amount of Gd3+ion has little effect on the cell parameters of LiFePO4,and the dopant of a larger ionic radius perhaps creates more defects in LiFePO4,which is beneficial for the electrochemical catalytic activity of the electrode.

Fig.10 (A)XRD of LiFePO4 and LiFePO4/C and(B)Rietveld refinement of XRD for LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C

Table 2 Unit cell parameter obtained from XRD Rietveld refinement of XRD for LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C and unit cell parameter of LiFePO4/C

6.2 Particle size,FE-SEM and EDS

The grain size of samples can be described by particle size distribution.Fig.11 presents the particle size distribution histogram of LiFePO4/C sample and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C sample,respectively.Fig.12 depicts the FE-SEM images of LiFePO4/C and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C,respectively.It is apparent from Fig.11 and Fig.12 that the particle size of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C sample is significantly smaller than that of LiFePO4/C sample,and the particle scale is uniform after doping Gd3+ion,which indicates that doping a small amount of Gd3+can effectively reduce the particle size of LiFePO4/C and make it more uniform.

Fig.11 (A)particle size distributions of LiFePO4/C and(B)particle size distributions of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C

Fig.12 FE-SEM images of LiFePO4/C(a)and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C(b)

The EDS image of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C is shown in Fig.13.The compositions of the substituent elements are listed in Table 3.The result shows the atomic ratio of Fe,Gd,P and O is 0.981∶0.067∶1∶4.858 in LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C sample,essentially coinciding with LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C.The supervalentcation dopant in LiFePO4 is studied by combining neutron and X-ray diffraction.The results showed that low levels of dopants were indeed soluble in the olivine lattice up to the extent of 3 mol%.Therefore,we infer that Gd3+ion occupies Fe2+ion site in LiFePO4/C or has been dissolved into LiFePO4/C to form a solid solution.

Fig.13 EDS image of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C

Table 3 Element composition in LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C

6.3 Electrochemical performance

The cycle performance of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C sample at various rates is shown in Fig.14(A).The maximum discharge capacity is 150.7 m Ah·g-1,125.9 mAh·g-1,106.0 mAh·g-1 and 81.3 mAh·g-1 at rates of 0.2 C,1 C,5 C and 10 C,respectively.Fig.14(B)shows the discharge curves of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C sample at various rates.It is concluded that doping an appropriate amount of Gd3+ion can improve the high-rate discharge performance of LiFePO4/C composite.

Fig.14 (A)Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C at various rates

Fig.14 (B)Second charge-discharge curves of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C at various rates

It is inferred that doping Gd3+ion can reduce the particle size of LiFePO4/C,shorten the transport path of Li+ion,increase the disorder of the lattice and create the defect in LiFePO4/C.These factors would improve the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C composite.

The electrochemical measurements have also been carried out at lower temperatures,as shown in Fig.15.And at 0.1 C rate,the initial discharge capacity is 122.2 m Ah·g-1,107.7 m Ah·g-1,80.4 m Ah·g-1 and 66.3 m Ah·g-1 at 0℃,-10℃,-20℃and-30℃,respectively.The discharge capacity monotonously sharply decreases with decreasing temperature,just as expected.At lower temperature the transport speed of Li+ion slows down and ohmic polarization influence becomes more dominant.These perhaps are key issues to influence discharge capability.

Fig.15 Initial charge-discharge curves of LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C at various temperatures

EIS was used to further analyze the effect of doping Gd3+ion on the electrode reaction impedance.Fig.16 shows EIS of LiFePO4/C electrode reaction and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C electrode reaction at 15℃.The results were obtained using Zview software and are listed in Table 4.The ohmic resistance(Rs)almost does not change for two samples,because the same electrolyte was used.As expected,charge-transfer impedance obviously decreases in the charge-discharge process because of the addition of Gd3+ion.The charge transfer resistance(Rct)for LiFe-PO4/C electrode reaction and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C electrode reaction is 692.6Ωand 241.3Ω,respectively.This great decrease in the impedance will benefit to overcome the restriction of kinetics in the charge-discharge process and improve the cycling performance of the material.

Fig.16 ElS for LiFePO4/C and LiFe0.93 Gd0.07 PO4/C electrode after 3 cycles

An apparent exchange current density(I0)can be often used to sign the catalytic activity of electrode,which is an important parameter of kinetics for an electrochemical reaction.When overpotential is very small,it can be calculated using Formula(1)[17]and the results are also listed in Table 4.I0=R·T/nRct·F(1)where R is gas constant,T is absolute temperature,F is Faraday constant,n is charge-transfer number and Rct is chargetransfer resistance.

Table 4 Electrochemical impedance and exchange current density

7 Aliovalent doping abnormal rare earth(Sm,Eu,Yb)or substitution for Fe site in LiFePO4

Compared with other rare earth elements,Sm,Eu and Yb have some unique characteristics and are often called as abnormal rare earth elements.Based on results of Nd and Gd as dopants in LiFe-PO4,doping Sm,Eu and Yb were also carried out via the same experimental procedures as above mentioned[18,19].

As expected,the effect of respective doping Sm,Eu and Yb in LiFePO4 on the electrochemical performances has almost the same results and trend.The experimental results of doping Sm as a representative element have been given below.

7.1 Electrochemical performance

The cycle performance of LiFe1-x Smx PO4/C sample and initial charge-discharge curves are shown in Fig.17(left)and(right),respectively,It is concluded from Fig.17 that due to doping Sm,the discharge capacity increases and the difference of plateau gap between the charge/discharge curves become narrow,and the polarization becomes small.The rate performance has been improved because of doping Sm in LiFePO4,just like as influence on discharge capacity.

Fig.17 Cycle performances(left)and initial charge-discharge curve of LiFe1-x Smx PO4/C(right)

Fig.18 shows EIS for LiFe1-x Smx PO4/C(x=0,0.06,0.08,0.10)electrode reaction.When x equals 0.08,Rct has lowest value,199Ω,much lower than that without doping Sm,1 211Ω.

Fig.18 ElS for LiFe1-x Smx PO4/C(x=0,0.06,0.08,0.10)

7.2 Temperature effect

The effect of temperature on the discharge capacity has been carried out for doping Sm at the range of-20℃to 60℃,as shown in Fig.19.The relation between discharge capacity and temperature is as expected.The discharge capacity monotonously sharply decreases both at higher or lower temperature than ambient temperature.

Fig.19 (a)Discharge capacity of LiFe1-x Smx PO4/C and(b)cycle performances of sample with x=0.08 at various temperature

8 There are many problems to be further investigated on doping in olivine LiFePO4

Since 1997,more than thousand papers on LiFePO4 cathode material for Liion battery have been published,and the application of LiFePO4 as cathode material is moving forward fast and has seen the first light in commercialization.Doping some elements in LiFePO4 is a very effective approach for the improvement of performances for LiFePO4 However,there are some academic problems to be investigated in future.More accurate experimental methods and compelling results are needed.

1.There are ambivalent viewpoints on dopant state in olivine lattice.Islam et al.reported that“on energetic ground,LiFePO4 is not tolerant to aliovalent doping(e.g.,Al,Ga,Zr,Ti,Nb,Ta)on either Li(M1)or Fe(M2)sites.”However,Wagemaker et al.stated that“low levels of dopants are indeed soluble in the olivine lattice up to the extent of 3 mol%(in bulk materials).”

2.How does the dopant exist in LiFePO4?and by substitution in Li site or Fe site or by forming solid solution in LiFePO4?

3.Why is it that a small amount of dopant can greatly improve the electrochemical performances of LiFePO4?Is it due to the creation of more defects in lattice or enhancing electrochemical activity?

4.Appropriate doping of some ions in LiFePO4 can improve the electrochemical performance,which is a well known essential fact.However,what is the dependable mechanism?

免责声明:以上内容源自网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。

我要反馈