1.“Reporter Daniel Pearl Is Dead，Killed by His Captors in Pakistan，”Wall Street Journal，February 24，2002，http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/pearl-022102.htm.
2.Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986，Public Law 99-508，99th Cong.，2d sess.（October 21，1986），18 U.S.C.§ 2702.b.
3.Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986，Public Law 99-508，99th Cong.，2d sess.（October 21，1986），18 U.S.C.Chapter 121 § § 2701 et seq.
4.Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986，Public Law 99-508，99th Cong.，2d sess.（October 21，1986），18 U.S.C.§ 2705.b.
5.“Law Enforcement Requests Report，”Corporate Social Responsibility，Microsoft，Last Modified June 2018，https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/about/corporate-responsibility/lerr/.
6.“Charlie Hebdo Attack:Three Days of Terror，”BBC News，January 14，2015，https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30708237。
7.“Al-Qaeda in Yemen Claims Charlie Hebdo Attack，”Al Jezeera，January 14，2015，https://www.aljazeera.com/news/middle east/2015/01/al-qaeda-yemencharlie-hebdo-paris-attacks-201511410323361511.html.
8.同上。
9.“Paris Attacks:Millions Rally for Unity in France，”BBC News，January 11，2015，https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30765824.
10.Alissa J.Rubin，“Paris One Year On，”New York Times，November 12，2016，https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/world/europe/paris-one-year-on.html.
11.“Brad Smith:New America Foundation:‘Windows Principles，’”Stories（blog），Microsoft，July 19，2006，https://news.microsoft.com/speeches/brad-smithnew-america-foundation-windows-principles/.
12.制定一套明确的原则花了几个月的时间。这项工作由霍拉西奥·古铁雷斯负责，他当时是微软最资深的产品律师，现在已经加盟Spotify担任总法律顾问，担负广泛的业务职责。他与前克林顿政府的官员马克·彭恩合作，后者具有敏锐的营销意识。霍拉西奥组建了一个跨越公司各个部门的内部团队，并邀请波士顿咨询公司的一个团队帮助我们进行客户调研，以了解客户最重视什么。霍拉西奥和团队制定了四项原则，并由我在2015年7月公布了这些“云承诺”原则。Brad Smith，“Building a Trusted Cloud in an Uncertain World，”微软全球合作伙伴大会，奥兰多，2015年7月15日，主旨演讲视频，https：//www.youtube.com/watch？v=RkAwAj1Z9rg。(www.xing528.com)
13.“Responding to Government Legal Demands for Customer Data，”Microsoft on the Issues（blog），Microsoft，July 16，2013，https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2013/07/16/responding-to-government-legal-demands-forcustomer-data/.
14.United States v.Jones，565 U.S.400（2012），https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1259.
15.同上，4。
16.Riley v.California，573 U.S._（2014）.
17.同上，20。
18.同上，21。
19.Steve Lohr，“Microsoft Sues Justice Department to Protest Electronic Gag Order Statute，”New York Times，April 14，2016，https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/15/technology/microsoft-sues-us-over-orders-barring-it-fromrevealing-surveiIlance.html？_r=0.
20.Brad Smith，“Keeping Secrecy the Exception，Not the Rule:An Issue for Both Consumers and Businesses，”Microsoft on the Issues（blog），Microsoft，April 14，2016，https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2016/04/14/keepingsecrecy-exception-not-rule-issue-consumers-businesses/.
21.Rachel Lerman，“Long List of Groups Backs Microsoft in Case Involving Digital-Data Privacy，”Seattle Times，September 2，2016，https://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft/ex-federal-law-officials-backmicrosoft-in-case-involving-digital-data-privacy/？utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=Referral&utm_campaign=RSS_all.
22.Cyrus Farivar，“Judge Sides with Microsoft，Allows‘Gag Order’Challenge to Advance，”Ars Technica，February 9，2017，https://arstechnica.com/techpolicy/2017/02/judge-sides-with-microsoft-allows-gag-order-challenge-toadvance/.
23.Brad Smith，“DOJ Acts to Curb the Overuse of Secrecy Orders.Now It's Congress’Turn，”Microsoft on the Issues（blog），Microsoft，October 23，2016，https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2017/10/23/doj-acts-curboveruse-secrecy-orders-now-congress-turn/.
免责声明：以上内容源自网络，版权归原作者所有，如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知，我们将尽快删除相关内容。
